top of page
Why do i believe in Jonghoon's innocence
-
The assault in Burning Sun
-
Who is Kim Sang Gyo
-
The assailant's identity
-
"Second Nongdan" plot
-
The plot "designers"
-
The twist in the plot
-
Conclusion
If you are Korean and wish to participate in translating this blog into Korean, please, contact me.
-
The hotel
-
The club's owners
-
The MDs
-
The VIPs
-
Who is Yoo Inseok
-
The investigation's start
​
-
"Seungri chat"
-
The "police chief"
-
Who is Yoon Gyu Geun
-
BS scandal turns into JJY chat scandal
-
Yoon's powerful friends
-
The forged cases
-
The end BS scandal
​
-
Jung Junyoung - accused of illegal filming
-
The police investigation
-
The phone - entrusted to private forensic company
-
The contradictions between the police and media claims in 2016 and 2019
-
The case forwarded to the prosecution
-
The result of the prosecution's analysis
-
JJY acquired
-
Why the private company didn't extract the phone's data
​
-
November 2018 - anonymous denunciation
-
Female celebrities tell reporter Kang about the chat
-
Kang knew about JJY 2 years ago
-
Who could be the informant
​
-
How Bang got the chat
-
Kang "verified" the file's authenticity
-
The file that was never analyzed
-
Why it was sent to ACRC
-
What is "report of public interest" and why this is not the case?
-
Bang submits to the police only few printed sheets
-
ACRC submits the file only to prosecution but not to police
-
Police conducts the investigation without the one and only evidence
-
JJY submits the "Golden Phone", but there is nothing
-
Investigation ends without finding any other evidence
​
-
Excel, photo and video files are editable
-
What is hash code and image file and why they don't prove authenticity
-
A copy without the original source value nothing
-
What about the metadata?
-
No results of official digital analysis from NFS of the file
-
How the informant and Bang managed to detect the crimes?
-
Where is the database?
-
Lots of data is missing from the file
-
When is the last day of the chat?
-
Bang admits that the file is not capable evidence without the phone and without the original forensic file
​
-
MobileLab- Korea's leading forensic company
-
Why MobileLab can't be the company recovered JJY's phone, who allegedly extracted the chat
-
MobileLab CEO's own words prove that the file is not legal evidence
-
MobileLab - political connections and strong protection
​
-
Who is lawyer Bang
-
More about the Youth Sports Association
-
Complaint against Bang in the Korean Bar Association, for violation of several laws
-
Bang's lies and manipulations
-
"Korean Mafia"
-
Reporter Kang, who "reconstructed" the chat, also violated several laws
-
Kang's lies and manipulations
-
Why Kang lied about the victims of illegal filming
​
-
Jonghoon's sentence - "adultery", not "rape"
-
What is "sexual assault" and definition of "adultery" and "quasi-rape"
-
The defendants was not allowed to defend themselves in the media
-
Jonghoon pleads INNOCENT, even thought this is disadvantageous and leads to a harder sentence
-
A verdict written by the media and the public, not the court
-
The victim failed to prove the state of unconsciousness - the key condition in the law
-
The victim is not able to point on a certain perpetrator(s)
-
No objective proof of the victim's claims
-
The victim's claims
-
They drank all night in 3 bars
-
She didn't book a room for herself in Daegu, so she went there to sleep in their room
-
She woke up nude with a man in the bed, but didn't suspect rape at all.
-
She doesn't even know who was there
-
She claims to be gang raped, but she didn't notice any traces of unwanted sex or traumas of her body
-
After the incident, she keeps friendly terms with the guys
-
Because of 6 photos from the bar, she got the idea that she was raped in the hotel​
-
A special team of 120 police officers couldn't find any physical or other objective proof of rape or her unconscious state
-
There is NO video
-
The 4 sec. audio file is not listed among the evidences in the court
-
The 6 photos are shot and posted in the bar, not in the hotel
-
The photos are BEFORE the alleged crime, they are not evidence for the adultery
-
The "evidence" from the conversation doesn't contain direct or indirect mention of "sex", or any sex-related word
-
The conversation is also from the night, BEFORE the alleged crime
​
-
The victim said she followed JJY in Daegu on March 18th
-
SBS said the conversation and the photos circulated in the chat on 18th
-
Bang revealed parts of that chat that proves that the conversation and the photos are from a night BEFORE they go to Daegu
-
The photos are not analyzed by NFS and the woman is not recognizable
-
On the photos are visible more than 1 woman?
-
Did JH and JJY really saw in the court the woman who accused them?
-
Where is the real chat from March 20th?​
-
The manipulations of the media
-
Jonghoon is NOT accused or sentenced of sexual assault in Hongcheon!
-
JH does NOT appear in any of the 3 sex videos and unknown number of pics from Hongcheon
-
JH was accused but acquitted of molestation - "intent to kiss", that is a separate case, not related with the sexual assaults
-
Who are the victims and what are their claims
​
Chapter 15 - The verdict
Coming Soon
​
​
bottom of page